Re: [boost] [scope_exit] Doesn't included in Boost yet?

Subject: Re: [boost] [scope_exit] Doesn't included in Boost yet?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-13 08:41:41

Alexander Nasonov wrote:

> my example has no parameters at all, only captures:
> 
> [&a, b]() -> void { /* ... */ }
>        ^^ - no parameters

I know, I never cared about your example. I was replying to the part 
that I actually quoted, and not the parts I purposely removed.

I care about ScopeExit as a mechanism to define inline functions with 
macros, and how that is more powerful than C++0x lambdas.
Indeed, it seemed to me during review that it was to be generalized as 
such and not just be used to define inline functions to be evaluated on 
scope exit.