Subject: Re: [boost] Proposed templated integer_sort
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-14 17:58:37
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 17:48, Phil Endecott
> I would hope that a class with no state in it would take no space, but I
> suppose compilers may be dumb about that sometimes.
Doesn't the standard require that it have a unique address,
essentially preventing that?
>>> I think you can use things like typename RandomAccessIter::value_type
>>> instead of passing *first in order to determine data_type.
>> I tried that, but it didn't compile on my system (MacOSX PPC gcc4.0.1).
> That's surprising. Maybe you could distil it down to a minimal example and
> we can all scratch our heads over it.
Maybe you can use the MPL metafunction version, with its possible workarounds?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk