|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Should we PING the ML when there is no answer at all to a post?
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-21 15:22:16
----- Original Message -----
From: "JOAQUIN M. LOPEZ MUÑOZ" <joaquin_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Should we PING the ML when there is no answer at all to a post?
_______________________________________
De: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] En nombre de vicente.botet [vicente.botet_at_[hidden]]
Enviado el: miércoles, 21 de enero de 2009 19:55
Para: boost_at_[hidden]
Asunto: [boost] Should we PING the ML when there is no answer at all to a post?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > sometimes the posts are not answered at all, either because there is no interest,
> > or because the post is lost between the others.
> >
> > I would like to know if it is a good idea to PING the ML when there is no answer at
> > all to a post.
>
> I've done it several times in the past and got no reprimand from
> the moderators, so I guess it's OK to do it with some restraint.
>
> > If yes, how and when this PING must be done?
>
> Repost the entire mail and add a [repost] prefix to the subject line.
Thanks Joaquin to answer to a post that could stay with no answer for a long time.
I'll do as you suggest,
Vicente
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk