Subject: Re: [boost] Vault: still needed?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-23 01:30:53
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:08 PM, David Abrahams >> The Boost Vault is
similarly simpler than a giant SVN tree (I suppose
>> the word "inadequate" was a bit excessive.)
> In what way is it simpler? It appears to be a giant directory tree, too.
I appears that I've misinterpreted what the vault really is. You're
right, it's also a giant directory tree, the main difference seems to
be that it contains "packages" as opposed to raw files. Or am I off on
this too? :)
I still don't understand why it makes sense for the vault packages to
be in SVN, but the official Boost distribution has to be in
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk