Subject: Re: [boost] [parameter] function types as named template parameters?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-23 14:59:29
on Fri Jan 23 2009, Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess-AT-nist.gov> wrote:
> On Friday 23 January 2009 12:39 pm, David Abrahams wrote:
>> This can't really be minimal, can it? Can you reduce it any further?
> Ok, how about this version?
Better, thanks. Well, several things are wrong here:
1. Our documentation should tell you to use value_type<...> instead of
binding<...> for named template parameters
2. You should use value_type<...> instead of binding<...> for named
template parameters ;-)
3. template_keyword's reference type should be value_type&.
Unfortunately, #3 will break legacy uses of binding for people that
followed our old instructions, so the real patch is attached:
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk