Re: [boost] Interest check: memoization

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest check: memoization
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-25 19:51:14

James Porter wrote:

> I'm still considering the syntax for that. It's simple enough for 
> boost::functions, but for generic function objects, it's not clear to me 
> what the syntax should be, since a function object could potentially 
> have many overloads of operator().

Why not simply

auto g = memoize(f); /* type of g is unspecified, using auto for 
automatic type deduction */

just like bind & friends.

Does your memoize adaptor require knowing the signatures of the function 
object?