Subject: Re: [boost] Coverity Static Code Analysis
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-04 11:48:08
> Perhaps you shouldbt use or follow boost since it appears so fraught with
> ill design and poor quality. I personally have found it otherwise.
> I'm afraid that if I wanted to really reply to this I'd have to
> question your professional skills. Significantly. Which I don't
> want to do.
Guys, I'm not pointing any fingers, but please don't allow this to
degenerate into a flame war.
I'm sure there are many ways Boost can be improved, please focus on specific
issues, and one would hope their solutions, rather than on blanket