Subject: Re: [boost] Coverity Static Code Analysis
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-04 11:48:08
> Perhaps you shouldbt use or follow boost since it appears so fraught with
> ill design and poor quality. I personally have found it otherwise.
> I'm afraid that if I wanted to really reply to this I'd have to
> question your professional skills. Significantly. Which I don't
> want to do.
Guys, I'm not pointing any fingers, but please don't allow this to
degenerate into a flame war.
I'm sure there are many ways Boost can be improved, please focus on specific
issues, and one would hope their solutions, rather than on blanket
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk