Re: [boost] Futures Review -- Where we are with the Futures review?

Subject: Re: [boost] Futures Review -- Where we are with the Futures review?
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-10 12:13:01

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anthony Williams" <anthony.ajw_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Futures Review -- Where we are with the Futures review?

> 
> "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
>>> 
>>> Futures Review Starts Today - January 5, 2009
>>> 
>>
>> Where we are with the Futures review?
> 
> Good question. It was supposed to be over by now, but there's been no
> statement from Tom.
> 
>> There was not too much reviews, neither responses from the authors,
>> ... What happened?
> 
> Sorry for not taking the time to respond to all your comments. They are
> much appreciated. Maybe the lack of reviews indicates a lack of interest
> from the Boost community? That's a shame, if so.

Could you try to respond now. I'll realy appreciate. 

>> Nevertheless, I'm sure that this library is essential to the
>> construction of high level concurrent libraries.
> 
> If you want to include my code (or something derived from it) in your
> interthreads library, or Oliver wants to include it with his threadpool
> submission, that's fine by me.

Thanks for the offert. But it will be realy a shame to don't have a Future library in Boost. Even if Olivier or me included it on his library futures mast be first class in Boost.

Regards,
Vicente