Subject: Re: [boost] Futures Review -- Where we are with the Futures review?
From: Anthony Williams (anthony.ajw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-10 12:32:38
David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
> on Tue Feb 10 2009, Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>> "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>> Futures Review Starts Today - January 5, 2009
>>> Where we are with the Futures review?
>> Maybe the lack of reviews indicates a lack of interest
>> from the Boost community? That's a shame, if so.
>>From my point of view, I was interested, but I found the idea of
> reviewing two libraries at once to be simply overwhelming.
Given that we do have two proposed libraries, have you any suggestions
on how to make the review process less overwhelming?
-- Author of C++ Concurrency in Action | http://www.manning.com/williams just::thread C++0x thread library | http://www.stdthread.co.uk Just Software Solutions Ltd | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL, UK. Company No. 5478976
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk