Re: [boost] Futures Review -- Where we are with the Futures review?

Subject: Re: [boost] Futures Review -- Where we are with the Futures review?
From: Anthony Williams (anthony.ajw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-10 12:32:38

David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:

> on Tue Feb 10 2009, Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>
>>>> 
>>>> Futures Review Starts Today - January 5, 2009
>>>> 
>>>
>>> Where we are with the Futures review?

>> Maybe the lack of reviews indicates a lack of interest
>> from the Boost community? That's a shame, if so.
>
>>From my point of view, I was interested, but I found the idea of
> reviewing two libraries at once to be simply overwhelming.

Given that we do have two proposed libraries, have you any suggestions
on how to make the review process less overwhelming?

Anthony
-- 
Author of C++ Concurrency in Action | http://www.manning.com/williams
just::thread C++0x thread library   | http://www.stdthread.co.uk
Just Software Solutions Ltd         | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk
15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL, UK. Company No. 5478976