Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Review-ready version in the Vault
From: Boris Schaeling (boris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-12 10:39:11
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:09:15 +0100, Peter Simons <simons_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> [...] > In this particular case, syslog support is simply lagniappe from
> > library that solves a whole host of other issues [...].
> Apparently you and I have different expectations. For me, all these
> other issues are just lagniappe. I don't care much about funky message
> formatters, attribute systems, and run-time configurable filters. I
> don't need any of that. However, I do need the ability to submit log
> messages to an RFC 3164 conforming syslog daemon.
I'm as puzzled as Ravi. Do I understand correctly that you expect a Boost
library to make a platform-specific feature platform-independent?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk