Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Move Where we are with move semantic emulation on C++03 compilers?
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-12 13:37:58

Next message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [log] Review-ready version in the Vault"
Previous message: Simonson, Lucanus J: "Re: [boost] Request For a feature - Templated virtual functions"
In reply to: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] Boost.Move Where we are with move semantic emulation on C++03 compilers?"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Boost.Move Where we are with move semantic emulation on C++03 compilers?"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 12 February 2009 12:19 pm, Ion Gaztañaga wrote:
> No, I'm working on it. Right now writing some Quickbook documentation.
> But I have a question on perfect forwarding: has anybody implemented
> perfect forwarding using boost preprocessor?

I've never used it, but isn't perfect forwarding what Boost.Functional/Forward
is supposed to support? It was accepted over a year ago and is on svn trunk,
but it looks like it was never merged into the release branch.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJlGyI5vihyNWuA4URAidFAJ9x9Bmut6ZdypwGd/zVx1LiYlezLQCcDSru
vP1rY3IlyVgv3dho5dbn0oo=
=Mroi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Next message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [log] Review-ready version in the Vault"
Previous message: Simonson, Lucanus J: "Re: [boost] Request For a feature - Templated virtual functions"
In reply to: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] Boost.Move Where we are with move semantic emulation on C++03 compilers?"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Boost.Move Where we are with move semantic emulation on C++03 compilers?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk