Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Request For a feature - Templated virtual functions
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-13 04:33:44

Next message: Raider: "Re: [boost] [iostreams] container_device"
Previous message: Edouard A.: "Re: [boost] [log] Review-ready version in the Vault"
In reply to: Gokulakannan Somasundaram: "Re: [boost] Request For a feature - Templated virtual functions"
Next in thread: Gokulakannan Somasundaram: "Re: [boost] Request For a feature - Templated virtual functions"
Reply: Gokulakannan Somasundaram: "Re: [boost] Request For a feature - Templated virtual functions"

Gokulakannan Somasundaram wrote:

> Attaching the files..

Testing with GCC 4.3.2, -O3 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer on an
Intel Core 2 Duo.

My results are:

Time elapsed: 2621 mu.s
11000000
Time elapsed: 3136 mu.s
22000000
Time elapsed: 2250 mu.s
5000000

Hence, switch is slightly faster.

Why do you test two times for the variant by the way?

Next message: Raider: "Re: [boost] [iostreams] container_device"
Previous message: Edouard A.: "Re: [boost] [log] Review-ready version in the Vault"
In reply to: Gokulakannan Somasundaram: "Re: [boost] Request For a feature - Templated virtual functions"
Next in thread: Gokulakannan Somasundaram: "Re: [boost] Request For a feature - Templated virtual functions"
Reply: Gokulakannan Somasundaram: "Re: [boost] Request For a feature - Templated virtual functions"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk