Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [future] @Tom -> review result?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-13 12:23:18

Next message: Larry Evans: "Re: [boost] [mpl] is there a or_seq like logical metafunction?"
Previous message: Peter Simons: "Re: [boost] [log] Review-ready version in the Vault"
In reply to: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] [future] @Tom -> review result?"
Next in thread: Johannes Brunen: "Re: [boost] [future] @Tom -> review result?"

AMDG

vicente.botet wrote:
>> Why does Anthony not just slip "futures" it into boost::threads. He maintains
>> that library. Its a non-issue. He doesn't need our approval to do that.
>>
>
> Well I don't know if this is sohaitable.

sohaitable?

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

Next message: Larry Evans: "Re: [boost] [mpl] is there a or_seq like logical metafunction?"
Previous message: Peter Simons: "Re: [boost] [log] Review-ready version in the Vault"
In reply to: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] [future] @Tom -> review result?"
Next in thread: Johannes Brunen: "Re: [boost] [future] @Tom -> review result?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk