Subject: Re: [boost] _SECURE_SCL for msvc
From: OvermindDL1 (overminddl1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-13 17:32:22
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hansi skrev:
>> the problem with _SECURE_SCL define was already discussed a few times on
>> this list. But til now it came never to a end.
>> Is there any interrest to get also compiled libraries for _SECURE_SCL
>> enabled and _SECURE_SCL disabled?
> Yes. I define
> import feature ;
> # Composite feaure that ensures <define> can propagate
> # to all dependencies, not just sub-projects.
> feature.feature secure-stl : on off : propagated composite optional ;
> feature.compose <secure-stl>off : <define>_SECURE_SCL=0
> <define>_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_DEPRECATE=1 ;
> And then add
> to the requirements.
> I am in favor of libraries being named differently, eg. with "_nsc" suffix.
Oh please yes. I always compile boost with secure_scl and a few
others things disabled (or some of my programs take exponentially
longer to run). Having name-mangled libraries for having those
enabled or disabled would be perfect.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk