Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [future] @Tom -> review result?
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-13 20:03:29

Next message: Scott McMurray: "Re: [boost] Review Request: Introduction of boost::string namespace and string-conversion functions"
Previous message: Larry Evans: "Re: [boost] [mpl] is there a or_seq like logical metafunction?"
In reply to: Anthony Williams: "Re: [boost] [future] @Tom -> review result?"
Next in thread: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [future] @Tom -> review result?"

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Williams" <anthony.ajw_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [future] @Tom -> review result?

>
> Tom Brinkman <reportbase_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> Considering the way this review has floundered at this point, that is
>> the best outcome that I can see.
>
> I am happy to do this if that's what people want.
>
> Anthony

And Braddock ?

Next message: Scott McMurray: "Re: [boost] Review Request: Introduction of boost::string namespace and string-conversion functions"
Previous message: Larry Evans: "Re: [boost] [mpl] is there a or_seq like logical metafunction?"
In reply to: Anthony Williams: "Re: [boost] [future] @Tom -> review result?"
Next in thread: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [future] @Tom -> review result?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk