Subject: Re: [boost] [mpl] is there a or_seq like logical metafunction?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-16 12:15:27
Larry Evans wrote:
> The times for all three implementations were all the same:
> user: [and_seq_and_iter.o] 0.000016
> system: [and_seq_and_iter.o] 0.000003
> And this is where the vector size was BOOST_MPL_LIMIT_VECTOR_SIZE,
> which was 20.
I don't trust the timings produced by bjam. I know it doesn't work on
windows, but I haven't looked at the unix implementation. Can you test
something that you know takes a significant amount of time to compile?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk