Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] static thread_specific_ptr?
From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-26 03:29:39
Roland Schwarz wrote:
> Does this mean you have solved the initialization problem for
> local statics? i.e. you made this thread-safe for every compiler?
Sorry, the shown usage pattern of course is not necessarily
usgae as a local static.
Nevertheless the question arises if the usage as a local
static is thread safe. I.e. in the example shown struct X
should live as a global variable in general. (I.e. if there
are no provisions in thread_specific_ptr that make it safe.)
-- _________________________________________ _ _ | Roland Schwarz |_)(_ | aka. speedsnail | \__) | mailto:roland.schwarz_at_[hidden] ________| http://www.blackspace.at
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk