Re: [boost] Formal Review: Boost.RangeEx

Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review: Boost.RangeEx
From: Giovanni Piero Deretta (gpderetta_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-27 12:23:22

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Neil Groves <neil_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>>
>> E.g. an algorithm like transform(-) should return a range.
>>
>> Or perhaps we need a new syntax to enable
>>
>>  rng && rng2 | transformed(binary_fun())
>>
>
> It seems that the '|' syntax is not much loved despite my deep affection for
> it. I am becoming inclined to concentrate more on the function syntax and
> just using the 'ed' convention.
>

I do like the '|' syntax, I just don't want it to be the only
recommended syntax.

-- 
gpd