Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review: Boost.RangeEx
From: Giovanni Piero Deretta (gpderetta_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-27 12:23:22
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Neil Groves <neil_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> E.g. an algorithm like transform(-) should return a range.
>> Or perhaps we need a new syntax to enable
>> rng && rng2 | transformed(binary_fun())
> It seems that the '|' syntax is not much loved despite my deep affection for
> it. I am becoming inclined to concentrate more on the function syntax and
> just using the 'ed' convention.
I do like the '|' syntax, I just don't want it to be the only
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk