Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] static thread_specific_ptr?
From: JoÃ£Âo Abecasis (jpabecasis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-01 06:19:09
Roland Schwarz wrote:
> Does this mean you have solved the initialization problem for
> local statics? i.e. you made this thread-safe for every compiler?
> (I remeber a very nasty bug in spirit because of the cited pattern.)
This was fixed in Spirit by solving the said problem. You can find the
with usage illustrated here, around line 238 (look for
Admittedly it can be cumbersome, but it works.
A performance hit has been reported for repeatedly callling call_once,
that can be solved with double-checked locking. This is not implemented
in the repository version.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk