Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review: Boost.RangeEx
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-02 10:04:11
on Fri Feb 27 2009, Neil Groves <neil-AT-grovescomputing.com> wrote:
>> E.g. an algorithm like transform(-) should return a range.
Agreed in that case. For transform in-place:
r = transform(r, f)
>> Or perhaps we need a new syntax to enable
>> rng && rng2 | transformed(binary_fun())
> It seems that the '|' syntax is not much loved despite my deep
> affection for it.
I love it I love it I love it I love it I love it I love it!
> I am becoming inclined to concentrate more on the
> function syntax and just using the 'ed' convention.
I have no affection for 'ed,' neither.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk