Subject: Re: [boost] [serialization] string serialization
From: Nikolay Mladenov (nikolay.mladenov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-03 11:37:03
How should I understand this?
as "Nope, it should be fixed",
or "Nope, deal with it"
or is it simply "get lost"?
This "simple" fact causes incompatibility problems between 64 and 32
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Nope, it's just a fact.
> Robert Ramey
> Nikolay Mladenov wrote:
>> I the basic_binary_iprimitive.ipp (and I suppose other files) the size
>> of the strings is serialized as
>> std::size_t and not as serialization::collection_size_type.
>> Is that intentional?
>> Nikolay Mladenov
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk