|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [utility] new auto_buffer class --- RFC
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-04 09:03:56
Thorsten Ottosen:
> But don't you agree that is is worth avoiding the check for the buffer
> being full when this is possible?
I'm fine with having a push_back_unchecked for the small percentage of cases
where its use would be justified. But the main and encouraged mode of
operation should be push_back.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk