Re: [boost] [utility] new auto_buffer class --- RFC

Subject: Re: [boost] [utility] new auto_buffer class --- RFC
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-06 10:16:23

Frank Mori Hess skrev:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Friday 06 March 2009, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>> Scott McMurray skrev:
>>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 18:29, Thorsten Ottosen
>>>
>>> <thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>> I do not want to supply the whole interface of vector.
>>> Why not?
>> It's a lot of work, so if rather have a reason to do this. And in
>> general it is not a drop-in replacement for vector, so there is no
>> reason to pretend it is.
> 
> What about the more general container concepts, for the sake of generic 
> programming?  Is it a Container/Forward Container/Sequence/Back Insertion 
> Sequence?

Currently it satisfies the reversible container concept.

-Thorsten