Subject: Re: [boost] [threadpool] version 22 with default pool
From: Edouard A. (edouard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-09 04:39:41
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:16:08 +0100, "vicente.botet"
> so no need to store the futures in a list. Do you see any problem with
No, that's exactly what I had in mind. It should run faster as
partitionning will be parallelized as well.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk