Re: [boost] is_virtual_base_of ?

Subject: Re: [boost] is_virtual_base_of ?
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-11 12:22:12

> I'm still having some problems with this.  Some compilers are flaging as 
> an error
> the case where B doesn't have a default constructor.

Rightly too I suspect :-(

What happens if you give class X an explicit default constructor that is 
declared but not implemented?  Maybe copy constructor, and assignment ops 
too in case the compiler tries to automatically create those?

HTH, John.