Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] boost/pool/pool.hpp why reinterpret_cast instead of static_cast?
From: Philippe Vaucher (philippe.vaucher_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-12 09:09:18

Next message: Hartmut Kaiser: "[boost] Now Accepting Mentor Applications for Google Summer of Code 2009"
Previous message: Daniel James: "Re: [boost] [Property Tree] Maintenance Takeover"
In reply to: Philippe Vaucher: "[boost] boost/pool/pool.hpp why reinterpret_cast instead of static_cast?"
Next in thread: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2010-10-10: "Re: [boost] boost/pool/pool.hpp why reinterpret_cast instead ofstatic_cast?"
Reply: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2010-10-10: "Re: [boost] boost/pool/pool.hpp why reinterpret_cast instead ofstatic_cast?"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] boost/pool/pool.hpp why reinterpret_cast instead of static_cast?"

>
> It is my understanding that void* to T* convertions should be done using
> static_cast and not reinterpret_cast.

No one knows? No one cares?

Philippe

Next message: Hartmut Kaiser: "[boost] Now Accepting Mentor Applications for Google Summer of Code 2009"
Previous message: Daniel James: "Re: [boost] [Property Tree] Maintenance Takeover"
In reply to: Philippe Vaucher: "[boost] boost/pool/pool.hpp why reinterpret_cast instead of static_cast?"
Next in thread: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2010-10-10: "Re: [boost] boost/pool/pool.hpp why reinterpret_cast instead ofstatic_cast?"
Reply: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2010-10-10: "Re: [boost] boost/pool/pool.hpp why reinterpret_cast instead ofstatic_cast?"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] boost/pool/pool.hpp why reinterpret_cast instead of static_cast?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk