Subject: Re: [boost] [geometry] robustness approaches
From: Simonson, Lucanus J (lucanus.j.simonson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-15 23:59:05
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 04:26:35PM -0200, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
>> IMO, any geometric library should provide a toolbox of exact
>> predicates (which shoud be exact independetly of the input type)
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> I agree.
> I've always thought that the adaptive floating-point arithmetic of
> Douglas Priest  and Jonathan Shewchuk  would be a good way to do
> this for floats and doubles. Any interest in developing a boost
> version of this code?
I'm aware of Shewchuk's work. He is a friend of one of my team mates. His 2D Delauney library (Triangles) is considered definitive. However, his software license is not free. I think providing in boost a library such as the adaptive floating point arithmetic Shewchuk's Triangles is based on is a great idea, but it can't be a derivitive work of Shewchuk's code. To be sucessful such a library should be developed along side an application for it such as his Delauney triangulation that will drive its development. It would be hard to develop in isolation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk