Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Chrono where we are?
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-16 18:19:30

Next message: vicente.botet: "[boost] convert_to: generic conversion between unrelated types"
Previous message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [object_pool] too slow?"
In reply to: vicente.botet: "[boost] Boost.Chrono where we are?"

Hi,

The Boost.Chrono do not compiles on cygwin. The MONOTONIC_CLOCK is not available.
I have just defined the monotonic_clock as system_clock and all works right.

Best,
Vicente
----- Original Message -----
From: "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 8:11 PM
Subject: [boost] Boost.Chrono where we are?

>
> Hi,
>
> In November 2008, Beman said: "The Chrono library in the sandbox is now more-or-less feature complete."
>
> This library is esential to conform some boost libraries implementing standard libraries as Boost.Thread and Boost.Future as much as possible to the standard. It will be used also on the Boost.ThreasPool library and I would like also to use it on my AsynchronousExecutors library.
>
> Can we expect to have Boost.Chrono for review soon?

Next message: vicente.botet: "[boost] convert_to: generic conversion between unrelated types"
Previous message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [object_pool] too slow?"
In reply to: vicente.botet: "[boost] Boost.Chrono where we are?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk