Subject: Re: [boost] [geometry] robustness approaches
From: Thomas Klimpel (Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-19 16:26:07
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> Sorry for the late response.
Your response was very helpful. It made it clear to me how you intent the geometry library to work. I will have to think about whether the proposed output converter will be able to resolve the problem of the floating-point output. (Note that the other discussed approaches were unable to produce floating-point output fulfilling Luke's requirements, so this is a nontrivial question.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk