Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: [boost] BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_INT64_T
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-24 01:38:54

Next message: Barend Gehrels: "Re: [boost] Can a Boost library use a component like GMP and mfpr that have a LGPL license ?"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "[boost] has_operator_new"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_INT64_T"
Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_INT64_T"

boost config includes BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T.

boost Is there any chance we might see BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_INT64_T
appear in the near future?

Robert Ramey

Next message: Barend Gehrels: "Re: [boost] Can a Boost library use a component like GMP and mfpr that have a LGPL license ?"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "[boost] has_operator_new"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_INT64_T"
Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_INT64_T"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk