Subject: Re: [boost] [config] A question about BOOST_NO_NESTED_FRIENDSHIP
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-26 15:25:57
John Maddock wrote:
> It was changed in TC1, and the current draft says:
I see, thanks for the clarification.
> However, I note that nothing making use of this macro (Borland and
> Codegear compilers define it), so I don't know what the rationale was
> for adding it, and annoyingly I can't find the Trac ticket or email that
> requested it now :-((
Well, I'm sure there was a reason for it. FWIW, I didn't merge it and
BOOST_NO_TYPENAME_WITH_CTOR to the release branch.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk