Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] atomic_count::operator++ return type
From: joaquin_at_[hidden]
Date: 2009-04-14 02:23:44

Next message: Michael Watkins: "[boost] Question about boost::multi_index::random_access splice()"
Previous message: Brian Wood: "Re: [boost] BoostCon 2009 Early Registration Extended to April 26th"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] atomic_count::operator++ return type"

Peter Dimov escribió:
> JOAQUIN M. LOPEZ MUÑOZ:
>
>> But maybe we're diverting off a bit. Given the current constraints, I've
>> got a protocol that could be implemented with an extension to the
>> interface of atomic_count::op++. Is this a reasonable thing to ask, or are
>> there unavoidable obstacles to have it?
>>
>
> It is reasonable.
>

Great! Thank you for your consideration. Shall I put a ticket for this?

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

Next message: Michael Watkins: "[boost] Question about boost::multi_index::random_access splice()"
Previous message: Brian Wood: "Re: [boost] BoostCon 2009 Early Registration Extended to April 26th"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] atomic_count::operator++ return type"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk