Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] atomic_count::operator++ return type
From: joaquin_at_[hidden]
Date: 2009-04-14 02:23:44

Peter Dimov escribió:
>> But maybe we're diverting off a bit. Given the current constraints, I've
>> got a protocol that could be implemented with an extension to the
>> interface of atomic_count::op++. Is this a reasonable thing to ask, or are
>> there unavoidable obstacles to have it?
> It is reasonable.

Great! Thank you for your consideration. Shall I put a ticket for this?

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at