Subject: Re: [boost] atomic_count::operator++ return type
Date: 2009-04-14 02:23:44
Peter Dimov escribió:
> JOAQUIN M. LOPEZ MUÑOZ:
>> But maybe we're diverting off a bit. Given the current constraints, I've
>> got a protocol that could be implemented with an extension to the
>> interface of atomic_count::op++. Is this a reasonable thing to ask, or are
>> there unavoidable obstacles to have it?
> It is reasonable.
Great! Thank you for your consideration. Shall I put a ticket for this?
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk