Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] The noexcept Specifier & Block
From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-16 17:33:46

Sebastian Redl wrote:
> > unexpected() at throw point.
> >
> We don't need noexcept for that; that's what an empty throw declaration
> does.

I'll let David Abrahams explain it to you. He knows quite well that
violation of "throw declaration" under the current standard doesn't
result in invocation of unexpected() at *throw point*.

Beside that, you're simply not paying attention:

"We therefore propose to deprecate C++ exception specifications in


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at