Subject: Re: [boost] The noexcept Specifier & Block
From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-16 17:33:46
Sebastian Redl wrote:
> > unexpected() at throw point.
> We don't need noexcept for that; that's what an empty throw declaration
I'll let David Abrahams explain it to you. He knows quite well that
violation of "throw declaration" under the current standard doesn't
result in invocation of unexpected() at *throw point*.
Beside that, you're simply not paying attention:
"We therefore propose to deprecate C++ exception specifications in
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk