Subject: Re: [boost] Building stage by default, pt. 2
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-19 17:15:53
David Abrahams wrote:
> on Thu Apr 16 2009, Vladimir Prus <vladimir-AT-codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> users might be very confused -- and might even miss "failed" messages.
>> Ideally, we should make Boost.Jam record information about failed targets,
>> and then say to user -- and the end of output -- which libraries failed to
>> build -- but that's Boost.Jam change :-(
> It doesn't have to be. I *think* you could add that functionality to
> Boost.Build without bjam changes.
You could... But it would mean making a target+action that depends on
all other targets. Which is not the nicest solution.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk