Subject: Re: [boost] request for interest in a garbage collection library
Date: 2009-04-21 10:57:33
Achilleas Margaritis escribió:
>> AFAICS, you can have an implementation of delete where "delete p" simply
>> calls the destructor of the object pointed to by p and then passes p to
>> an internal garbage collector that will reclaim the memory in due time.
>> This way you have determinstic resource liberation *and* GC speed.
> If you do that, what is the point of keeping the memory occupied by 'p'
> around? the object will be destroyed anyway and therefore it will not be
> of any use.
The point is that deferring memory release to the next GC round can be
releasing every little piece of memory immediately, at least in some
Take into acount that free(x) is by no means free in terms of execution
time (no pun intended)
--some bookkeeping has to be done by the internal memory manager when
block of memory.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk