Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in atomic library?
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-23 13:40:31


I think every one wants a Atomic library in Boost following as much as possible the current standard. The interest is triple: first for the Boost developers using this library in its onw libraries, second for the users using these more permormant and thread-safe libraries, and for the developers using the library for its own applications.

So, yes I'm interested in Boost.Atomic.

There are already a lot of internal implementation in Boost. Maybe the authors can point to these implementations. It could be great if someone starts to make a concrete proposal.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Sid Sacek" <ssacek_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in atomic library?

> There appears to be a more recent PDF available, dated March 23, 2009.
> -Sid Sacek
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Beman Dawes
>> Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in atomic library?
>> The best reference is the current C++ Standard Working Paper. Go to
>> and select "Current C++
>> Standard Working Paper" in the "Other information" section.
>> --Beman
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at