Subject: Re: [boost] Intentions of Boost.TR1
From: Eugene Wee (crystalrecursion_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-01 03:38:12
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:06 AM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I just saw this post on comp.lang.c++.moderated. Â I wonder if the
> Boost.TR1 documentation shouldn't clarify its intended use or degree of
> conformity. Â I don't think TR1 conformity is something we have been
> paying much attention to, is it?
It was clear to me that the conformance of Boost.TR1 depends on the
conformance of the respective Boost libraries.
There is a "TR1 By Subject" page that seems to address this:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk