Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Intentions of Boost.TR1
From: Eugene Wee (crystalrecursion_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-01 03:38:12

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:06 AM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I just saw this post on comp.lang.c++.moderated.  I wonder if the
> Boost.TR1 documentation shouldn't clarify its intended use or degree of
> conformity.  I don't think TR1 conformity is something we have been
> paying much attention to, is it?

It was clear to me that the conformance of Boost.TR1 depends on the
conformance of the respective Boost libraries.

There is a "TR1 By Subject" page that seems to address this:

Eugene Wee

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at