Subject: Re: [boost] Review request: gil::io
From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-07 10:32:29
QQ. Why is there no dates on any upcoming reviews? Also, am I
responsible to find a review manager?
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Ronald Garcia <garcia_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> I have received your request and have added this library to the review
> On May 4, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Christian Henning wrote:
>> Hi to all,
>> the new gil::io extension is ready for review. The release candidate
>> is available from the link below containing the header files, tests,
>> and documentation. There are jamfiles available to run the tests and
>> to compile the documentation.
>> This file is almost 9 MB due to the amount of test images I'm using
>> for testing. If that's a problem I can certainly create a slimmer
>> release candidate.
>> A lot of things have changed for this extension but also a lot of
>> things haven't. The interface is more or less the same. But the list
>> of features has been grown by a lot. For instance, all formats support
>> now in-memory read and write. The tiff extension supports a lot more
>> formats to be read and written. n-bit images are now supported for all
>> formats that include those. etc. etc.
>> Right now the lib is called gil::io_new but once it's accepted it will
>> be renamed to gil::io.
>> Of course, I'm open for all kinds of input, critiques, and insights.
>> Thanks a lot to all people who have helped me on this release!
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk