Subject: [boost] [chrono] Motivation for Boost version evaporating
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-12 13:59:15
The motivation for a Boost version of <chrono> seems to be evaporating
since GCC 4.4.0 has shipped with an implementation and Microsoft has
also signaled they intend to ship a C++0x standard library
implementation sooner rather than later.
Thus I'm no longer interested in working on a Boost version.
If anyone else would like to take it on, that's OK with me, but I
don't see enough benefit to Boost to make the effort worthwhile.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk