Re: [boost] [chrono] Motivation for Boost version evaporating

Subject: Re: [boost] [chrono] Motivation for Boost version evaporating
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-12 17:01:25

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:49 PM, vicente.botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while specific compilers can provide a chrono library it is not sure that the library works without some C++0x laguage feature. I have to work with compiler versions that do not supporting C++0x features. I would prefer to use on these compilers a C++98 adaptation of the standard chrono library than nothing.
>
> If you don't mind I'd like to take it and request a formal review as the library has a fixed interface and a quite stable implementation.

OK, but be careful. I think there were a few hacks in the
implementation relating to overload resolution or maybe selection of
template specializations. You probably what to check the code against
the actual standard.

Cheers,

--Beman