Subject: Re: [boost] [iterators] Proof-of-concept for a sentinel iterator adapter
From: Kevin Sopp (baraclese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-13 10:55:43
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'm a little surprised that Boost doesn't already have such an iterator
> adapter. Or am I just missing it?
> Would a production version of this iterator adapter be a worthwhile addition
> to Boost.Iterators?
Absolutely, I haven't even thought of such a simple solution.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk