Subject: Re: [boost] [rfc] Unicode GSoC project
From: Graham (Graham_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-15 18:25:24
>I don't plan on supporting random access for UTF-16.
>UTF-16 is still faster than UTF-8 because UTF-8 requires more complex
>UTF-16 has only two cases, making it easier to optimize branches under
>the likely and unlikely case.
Don't forget surrogates !
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk