Subject: Re: [boost] [repost][threads] final decision on making parts of Boost.Threads header-only
From: Anthony Williams (anthony.ajw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-18 06:50:13
> A few weeks ago we had a discussion about the convenience
> of making part of Boost.Threads, namely mutexes and locks,
> header-only. Some (including Anthony Williams) supported the
> idea, others disliked it:
> What the final decision on this issue is? If positive (i.e. favoring
> the change), can it be expected to be done for Boost 1.40?
I haven't yet had a chance to investigate the issues. I will try and do
so reasonably soon.
-- Author of C++ Concurrency in Action | http://www.manning.com/williams just::thread C++0x thread library | http://www.stdthread.co.uk Just Software Solutions Ltd | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL, UK. Company No. 5478976
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk