Subject: Re: [boost] boost trac for upcoming libraries?
From: Marcus Lindblom (macke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-20 03:58:04
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Beman Dawes wrote:
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Barend Gehrels <barend_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Is the Boost Trac system intended for official libraries only, or can we
>>> also use it for (to be) proposed libraries?
>> Seems OK to me to use it for proposed libraries, as long as the use
>> wouldn't cause confusion between proposed and accepted libraries.
> I suspect confusion is very likely -- in particular, having bug report
> against proposed library with target milestone of 1.40 would be fairly
> confusing. Or, maybe there's some technical measure to limit possible
> values of properties for bug reports?
How about just name the component clearly, i.e. "[prop] FooBar" and then
remove the tag once accepted. (And choose a good prefix scheme that make
the proposed libraries end up last in the list.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk