Subject: Re: [boost] G++ hack/challenge?
From: Daniel Frey (d.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-27 11:10:30
On 30.04.2009, at 17:50, David Abrahams wrote:
> Ideally, "has a move constructor" would mean
> - when constructed from an rvalue of the same type, a copy
> with signature T(T const&) is not used.
> though I would settle for
> - has a constructor with the signature T(T&&)
> I'm willing to use G++-specific hackery if necessary.
> I strongly suspect it's impossible, but if you can think of any way to
> do it, I'd really appreciate knowing about it. You'll be my hero
> forever ;-)
While I realize it might be too late for your needs (BoostCon) and
what I have is incomplete, I still hope the following is useful as a
starting point towards a real has_move_constructor:
Tested with GCC 4.4.0
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk