Subject: Re: [boost] [Modularization] A new approach to header modularization
From: Ilya Sokolov (ilyasokol_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-28 10:31:46
Beman Dawes wrote:
Looks ugly for my taste, sorry.
> In theory, the root/libs/... tree isn't needed anymore. In practice we
> might want to keep a root/libs/libname/index.html entry for each library
> so docs links don't break.
> Apologies if someone already suggested this approach. It is so simple I
> can't believe someone didn't already suggest it.
> Unless I'm missing something, this is the only approach that appears to
> do fairly well for all of the Goals/Objectives/Needs/Wants,
It doesn't make dependencies of header-only libraries explicit.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk