Subject: Re: [boost] [Modularization] A new approach to header modularization
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-28 17:45:42
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Daniel James <daniel_james_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Although, you can add me to the people who are currently happy enough
> with the status quo.
Me too, I don't understand what would this reorganization improve.
What would make sense for me personally would be an effort to reduce
physical coupling in Boost, by moving as much code as possible from
headers to CPP files.
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk