Subject: Re: [boost] [Modularization] A new approach to header modularization
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-29 08:31:56
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski wrote
> On Friday, May 29, 2009 3:37 AM
>> One way to make building libs as painless as not having to build them
>> is to use Boost Build itself to build your programs. It makes the
>> presence of cpps/libs an implementation detail. In my own code
>> repository, I have many libs and many cpp files and many header-only
>> libs and I don't keep track which is which -- Boost Build figures it
>> out for me.
> That's simply not going to happen for most Boost users, so it's a non-starter.
What is not going to happen for most Boost users? To use a good build system?
And the solution to the "my build system sucks, I don't want to build
the libraries I use" problem is to put everything in headers?
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk