Subject: Re: [boost] boost::directx?
From: Christian Schladetsch (christian.schladetsch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-07 10:38:29
> I don't think anyone denies that. What we don't seem to agree on is whether
> that common namespace should start with ::boost::
That is the question asked by my original post.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk