Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Borland tests
From: siliconman (siliconman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-08 16:33:54

Next message: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz: "Re: [boost] Boost.Bloom_filter now in Sandbox (WAS Re: Interest in a Bloom Filter?)"
Previous message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] Why the integration branchmust remain clean, etc."
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Borland tests"
Next in thread: siliconman: "Re: [boost] Borland tests"
Reply: siliconman: "Re: [boost] Borland tests"

In article <423EC606BB5140158ABE6412510E8F55_at_acerlaptop>,
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> > I'm using this for local testing:
>
> As I don't have a copy of that compiler, can you please go ahead and commit?

Done. rev 53760

-- 
-David

Next message: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz: "Re: [boost] Boost.Bloom_filter now in Sandbox (WAS Re: Interest in a Bloom Filter?)"
Previous message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] Why the integration branchmust remain clean, etc."
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Borland tests"
Next in thread: siliconman: "Re: [boost] Borland tests"
Reply: siliconman: "Re: [boost] Borland tests"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk